In the end we all lose, St. Athanasius once said that "even if all churches are occupied by the enemy, we dont need walls to be in church" the Catholic tradition is being dismantle as we speak, since vatican II each day apostasy has been walking steadily towards the temple... Communists, atheists, protestants, masons have been infiltrating our church by the hundreds... diabolical disorientation is meant for the ones who wants to follow tradition... in the internet site harvestinthefruits.com has said that most traditionals who see Mr Voris attacking everybody BUT, are a little bit confuse by his stance, but we should give him a chance because sooner or later if the vatican continues this trend he will have to say something and we should leave him alone... and I fear that even though it is reasonable to do what mr. delvecchio is saying, what eventualy happen for mr. voris to open his eyes? another Notredame? but this time in the Vatican... Make no mistake Bergoglio is not stupid and he knows why he did this, first to confuse, second more PR, and 3rd to take the pulse of the church now and if he sees too much trouble (which is NOT happening) this comunion for the divorced and re-married WILL happen and like it happene in England with Henry the VIII 95% of all bishops will jump on board and apostasy will be great.

Matthew 19:8-10
Jesus replied, “Moses let you divorce your wives because you were stubborn. But it was not this way from the beginning. Here is what I tell you. Anyone who divorces his wife and gets married to another woman commits adultery except for sexual immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery.”10 The disciples said to him, “If that’s the way it is between a husband and wife, it is better not to get married.”

" but from the beginning it was not so" Jesus answered those who wanted to test him on the subject of divorce by appealing to the decree of Moses. It is clear the selfish plans of man are different to the original plan of God.
Man always find ways to distort God's plan. Neither Kasper nor Bergoglio are interested in meeting and restoring all things in Christ today. We can clearly see the hardness of the heart of man to accept the law do not commit adultery. 'A relativistic tactic to abolish the resistance consists of using questions because when you use questions you translate a law of God to the level of emotions and this is how many people try to win the arguments for abortion and this is how the CLEVER Serpent tempted Eve.

I speak with many different people during the duties of my job.
I know 1st hand the havoc all this confusion is sowing.
When the Pope speaks like this: People in the unfortunate circumstance of a failed marriage or a sinful relationship. see a justification of their actions. They begin to believe that they need NOT change their lives. There is sown that seed of doubt, and that is enough for the Devil to reap his harvest.

I spoke with a man 27-35 years of age the other day. He is reading and studying everything he can get his hands on. {except Christianity} He reads Confucius and Buddhism and Native American worship. etc etc
This young man was baptized, but is now very antagonistic to Christianity.

BUT...He likes this Pope BECAUSE {says the young man} Pope Francis says :That all you need to do is be a good person, no matter your religion, even if you don't have one, and you will be fine and go to Heaven.

Devastating!

Most Sacred Heart of Jesus: Have Mercy on us

I would like to know if "paradigm change" takes place in the speech of any of the Cardinals + Pope. The term stems from Thomas Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Kuhn maintains that a "paradigm change" from system A to system B, means that the two systems cannot be seen as a continuity. Think for a second. Latin underwent many paradigm changes (and the concept stems from grammar theory) such that, for instance, Latin and French are different Languages, i.e., French is no longer a continuation of Latin. For that matter French, after 1066 AD in England, was taken up into Anglo-Saxon Middle High English and eventually lost its gramatic paradigms to become modern English. And modern English, despite many related words, is NOT a continuation of medieval French which was not a continuation Augustian Latin. Why my degression?

If Cardinal Kasper, applauded by Bergoglio, is really putting forth a "paradigm change" in the Catholic understanding of marriage such that what was before part of then paradigm A (no remarrige and going to the sacraments) is now to become paradigm B (remarriage accepted enough for frequenting the sacraments), the result will be, using Kuhnian terminology, two theologies incompatible with each other, not a continuation, i.e., to an essential degree they will constitute no more continuity than Latin with French and mideval French with modern English. Breaks, breaks, breaks >> incompatible novelities. So, I ask again: Is the use of paradigm change part of Kasper or the interpeataion of "Immaculate heart"? If paradigm change is really involved, then the Catholic Church of the Ages will cease to be the institution called the Catholic Church of today. I would like clarification. A lot is at stake.