AI ON GOOGLE AND X SEE A CONTINUATION AND COHERENCE IN THE LIONEL ANDRADES INTERPRETATION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II
AI ON GOOGLE AND X SEE A CONTINUATION AND COHERENCE IN THE LIONEL ANDRADES INTERPRETATION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II
AI on X and Google, when asked, see a continuation and coherence in the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II.
AI on Google and X indicate Lionel Andrades reconciles the SSPX with Vatican Council II.
When Vatican Council II is dogmatic (AG 7/EENS), ecclesiocentric (AG 7/EENS) and traditional then religious liberty, collegiality, ecumenism etc are traditional and non controversial.
Liberal and conservative Catholics are obliged to interpret the Council only rationally. This is the only honest and moral choice they have.
Vatican Council II irrational (LG 16 visible) is schismatic and so there is a new theology. Quas Primas and extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) are made obsolete.
In the SSPX Declaration of Faith there is no mention of Vatican Council II, rational, with LG 16 invisible. This interpretation of the Council is aligned with all the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms interpreted only rationally.
The SSPX has been interpreting Vatican Council II with the implicit-explicit confusion of the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston. Without this mistake, Vatican Council II is traditional. The Council is aligned with Tradition and not liberalism and progressivism.
AI on X and Google, when asked, see a continuation and coherence in the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II. There is a return to the old salvation-theology of the Roman Missal.
The excommunication of the SSPX bishops and the Superior General and also earlier, that of Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, was political-left. But the Council interpreted rationally is aligned with the traditionalists and not the popes from Paul VI to Leo XIV.
Cardinals Muller, Ladaria, Fernandez, Cupich, Burke and Sarah, must affirm Vatican Council II and the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms, rationally. The College of Cardinals which elected Pope Leo XIV was Cushingite and not Feeneyite. Cushingism is schismatic.The cardinals during the pontificate of Pope Pius X, were Feeneyite and not Cushingite.
Amoris Latitia, Fiducia Supplicans and Traditionis Custode of Pope Francis and even the New Missal of Pope Paul VI and the accompanying Prayer Books, are Cushingite.They do not affirm Feeneyite EENS. They are not dogmatic and ecclesiocentric.
So it is Bishop Michael Olsen, progressivist in Texas , who is in schism and not the Arlington Discalced Carmelite Sisters, who were following traditional Carmelite theology, compatible with Vatican Council II, rational.
With Vatican Council II rational, the mainline Catholic Church has to become traditional and no more liberal. Also Apostolic Visitations will only be apostolic, with Vatican Council II rational.
Sedevacantist bishops Donald Sanborn and Mark Pivarunas and others, have to interpret Vatican Council II like Lionel Andrades, in harmony with Feeneyite EENS and the Athanasius Creed with no visible exceptions etc.
The cardinal and bishops in Pakistan, who have been informed about this issue, via the Internet, must clarify that they affirm only Vatican Council II rational. The Council has no explicit exceptions for Feeneyite EENS, the Athanasius Creed, the Nicene Creed (I believe in one baptism- with LG 16 invisible) and all the Catechisms interpreted only rationally.
AI on Google and X say Lionel Andrades is consistent and coherent on Vatican Council II and Tradition. Pope Leo and the bishops’ conferences and College of Cardinals and Synods will have to adapt.
The interpretation of Vatican Council II by Taylor Marshall, Michael Matt, Roberto dei Mattei, Eric Sammons and EWTN, Trent Horn and Catholic Answers and Edward Pentin and the NCR and others, is, political left. They will have to affirm Feeneyite EENS, the EENS of the Church Councils, which defined EENS and did not mention any exception. Lionel Andrades
IL MESSAGGERO REPORTS ON SSPX ORDINATION DO NOT SAY THAT VATICAN COUNCIL II IS DOGMATIC AND ECCLESIOCENTRIC : CARD. FERNANDEZ IS IN SCHISM
IL MESSAGGERO REPORTS ON SSPX ORDINATION DO NOT …
So a judge can clarify that reports on Vatican Council II in the media must not project possibilities as concrete exceptions for the dogma EENS of the 16th century Magisterium.)
From AI on X .
x.com/i/grok?conversation=2085348729851121968
August 8,2026
Il Messaggero interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally: there is no denial from Roberto Napoletano, Franca Giansoldati and the Editorial Dept.
Il Messaggero interpreted Vatican Council II …
Cardinal Ratzinger did not tell Lefebvre and Feeney that Vatican Council II supports them instead of his friends Rahner and Kung
07.08.2026
Extracts from AI on X at Lionel Andrades' channel.
Cardinal Ratzinger did not tell Lefebvre and …
06.08.2026
Vatican Council II supports the traditionalists, the newspapers must note: apology due to the SSPX
Vatican Council II supports the traditionalists, …
05.08.2026
IL MESSAGGERO REPORTS ON VATICAN COUNCIL II ARE IRRATIONAL, POLITICAL AND DISHONEST. THERE IS A RATIONAL AND HONEST ALTERNATIVE
IL MESSAGGERO REPORTS ON VATICAN COUNCIL II ARE …
04.08.2026
SSPX CHAPEL IN ROME :. NETWORKING IS NEEDED, MEDIA HAS TO BE MONITORED, PRESS RELEASES ISSUED
SSPX CHAPEL IN ROME :. NETWORKING IS NEEDED, …
04.08.2026
Bishops in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh say outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation according to Vatican Council II.
Bishops in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh say …
03.08.2025
CARDINAL AND BISHOPS IN PAKISTAN SAY OUTSIDE THE CATHOLIC CHURCH THERE IS NO SALVATION ACCORDING TO VATICAN COUNCIL II INTERPRETED RATIONALLY.
No denial of reports on Internet
CARDINAL AND BISHOPS IN PAKISTAN SAY OUTSIDE THE …