“How do I love thee?” Abortionist Carhart’s Fatal Attraction
Last week Germantown abortionist LeRoy Carhart did what he says he hasn’t done in 10 years: He allowed his name in print to announce a speaking engagement at the prestigious Johns Hopkins University…More
Last week Germantown abortionist LeRoy Carhart did what he says he hasn’t done in 10 years: He allowed his name in print to announce a speaking engagement at the prestigious Johns Hopkins University, an hour from his late-term abortion business in Germantown, Maryland. He took note of the security precautions.
“Thank you so much for coming,” was repeated again and again as students and providers came forward to ask a wide range of questions of Carhart, referring to himself as one of four U.S. doctors who had already developed an injection to bring fetal demise, outwitting “the antis” who he describes as using the courts for no reason other than seeking to limit abortion access.
Topics for the evening included his perspective on a soon to be argued Supreme Court case, the future of tele-med abortion (where abortion pills are dispensed from a drawer with a doctor on a computer screen somewhere else in the country), his greatest rewards and challenges, to name a few.
From several things …More
“Thank you so much for coming,” was repeated again and again as students and providers came forward to ask a wide range of questions of Carhart, referring to himself as one of four U.S. doctors who had already developed an injection to bring fetal demise, outwitting “the antis” who he describes as using the courts for no reason other than seeking to limit abortion access.
Topics for the evening included his perspective on a soon to be argued Supreme Court case, the future of tele-med abortion (where abortion pills are dispensed from a drawer with a doctor on a computer screen somewhere else in the country), his greatest rewards and challenges, to name a few.
From several things …More
- Report
Social media
Change post
Remove post
Jungerheld
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
@aderito, you are right! You've reminded me of what Fr. Marcel Guarnizo said in writing about another infamous abortionist, Kermit Gosnell: "It should be firmly locked in our thinking that no human being has any jurisdiction assigned by democracy to vote on who shall live and who shall die. The right to life is not something that is morally within our power as citizens to deny to any member of the …More
@aderito, you are right! You've reminded me of what Fr. Marcel Guarnizo said in writing about another infamous abortionist, Kermit Gosnell: "It should be firmly locked in our thinking that no human being has any jurisdiction assigned by democracy to vote on who shall live and who shall die. The right to life is not something that is morally within our power as citizens to deny to any member of the human species, regardless of race, color, religion, gender, size, or stage of development. Unalienable rights are beyond the legitimate jurisdiction of voters. Courts lose legitimacy when they claim authority over things beyond their legitimate reach."
How do I love thee?
.
His is not an example of Love but merely a mendacious desire for monetary gain by killing the unborn.
.
"Conscious love rarely obtains between humans; but it can be
illustrated in the relations of man to his favourites in the animal and
vegetable kingdoms. The development of the horse and the dog from their
original state of nature; the cultivation of flowers and fruit—these are …More
How do I love thee?
.
His is not an example of Love but merely a mendacious desire for monetary gain by killing the unborn.
.
"Conscious love rarely obtains between humans; but it can be
illustrated in the relations of man to his favourites in the animal and
vegetable kingdoms. The development of the horse and the dog from their
original state of nature; the cultivation of flowers and fruit—these are
examples of a primitive form of conscious love, primitive because the
motive is still egoistic and utilitarian. In short, Man has a personal use for
the domesticated horse and the cultivated fruit; and his labour upon them
cannot be said to be for love alone. The conscious love motive, in its
developed state, is the wish that the object should arrive at its own native
perfection, regardless of the consequences to the lover. 'So she become
perfectly herself, what matter I?' says the conscious lover. 'I will go to hell if
only she may go to heaven'. And the paradox of the attitude is that such
love always evokes a similar attitude in its object.
.
"Conscious love begets conscious love. It is rare among humans because, in the first place, the vast majority are children who look to be loved but not to love; secondly, because perfection is seldom conceived as the proper end of human love—though it alone distinguishes adult human from infantile and animal love; thirdly, because humans do not know, even if they wish, what is good for those they love; and fourthly, because it never occurs by chance, but must be the subject of resolve, effort, self-conscious choice.Such a lover enrolls himself, goes through his apprenticeship, and perhaps one day attains to mastery. He perfects himself in order that he may purely wish and aid the perfection of his beloved.
.
"Would one enroll in this service of conscious love? Let him forswear personal desire and preconception. He contemplates his beloved. Whatmanner of woman (or man) is she (or he)? A mystery is here: a scent of perfection the nascent air of which is adorable. How may this perfection be actualized—to the glory of the beloved and of God her Creator? Let him
think, is he fit? He can only conclude that he is not. Who cannot cultivate flowers, or properly treat dogs and horses, how shall he learn to reveal the perfection still seedling in the beloved? Humility is necessary, and then deliberate tolerance. If I am not sure what is proper to her perfection, let her at least have free way to follow her own bent. Meanwhile to study—what she is, and may become; what she needs, what her soul craves and
cannot find a name, still less a thing, for. To anticipate today her needs of tomorrow. And without a thought all the while of what her needs may mean to me. You will see, sons and daughters, what self-discipline and selfeducationare demanded here. Enter these enchanted woods, ye who dare."
On Love © 1924 A. R. Orage
.
His is not an example of Love but merely a mendacious desire for monetary gain by killing the unborn.
.
"Conscious love rarely obtains between humans; but it can be
illustrated in the relations of man to his favourites in the animal and
vegetable kingdoms. The development of the horse and the dog from their
original state of nature; the cultivation of flowers and fruit—these are
examples of a primitive form of conscious love, primitive because the
motive is still egoistic and utilitarian. In short, Man has a personal use for
the domesticated horse and the cultivated fruit; and his labour upon them
cannot be said to be for love alone. The conscious love motive, in its
developed state, is the wish that the object should arrive at its own native
perfection, regardless of the consequences to the lover. 'So she become
perfectly herself, what matter I?' says the conscious lover. 'I will go to hell if
only she may go to heaven'. And the paradox of the attitude is that such
love always evokes a similar attitude in its object.
.
"Conscious love begets conscious love. It is rare among humans because, in the first place, the vast majority are children who look to be loved but not to love; secondly, because perfection is seldom conceived as the proper end of human love—though it alone distinguishes adult human from infantile and animal love; thirdly, because humans do not know, even if they wish, what is good for those they love; and fourthly, because it never occurs by chance, but must be the subject of resolve, effort, self-conscious choice.Such a lover enrolls himself, goes through his apprenticeship, and perhaps one day attains to mastery. He perfects himself in order that he may purely wish and aid the perfection of his beloved.
.
"Would one enroll in this service of conscious love? Let him forswear personal desire and preconception. He contemplates his beloved. Whatmanner of woman (or man) is she (or he)? A mystery is here: a scent of perfection the nascent air of which is adorable. How may this perfection be actualized—to the glory of the beloved and of God her Creator? Let him
think, is he fit? He can only conclude that he is not. Who cannot cultivate flowers, or properly treat dogs and horses, how shall he learn to reveal the perfection still seedling in the beloved? Humility is necessary, and then deliberate tolerance. If I am not sure what is proper to her perfection, let her at least have free way to follow her own bent. Meanwhile to study—what she is, and may become; what she needs, what her soul craves and
cannot find a name, still less a thing, for. To anticipate today her needs of tomorrow. And without a thought all the while of what her needs may mean to me. You will see, sons and daughters, what self-discipline and selfeducationare demanded here. Enter these enchanted woods, ye who dare."
On Love © 1924 A. R. Orage
