Where Is Peter strikes at Traditional Catholics once again, including SSPX, Bishop Athanasius Schneider, and Lifesitenews. It concludes: ... When voices are raised about problems within the traditionalist movement, the Latin Mass is not at all the most urgent concerns. There are countless more examples of antisemitism and other forms of extremism within the movement. And rarely do you see any of …More
Where Is Peter strikes at Traditional Catholics once again, including SSPX, Bishop Athanasius Schneider, and Lifesitenews. It concludes: ... When voices are raised about problems within the traditionalist movement, the Latin Mass is not at all the most urgent concerns. There are countless more examples of antisemitism and other forms of extremism within the movement. And rarely do you see any of them bat an eye in the face of it. Traditionalists have also shown repeatedly that they are incapable of addressing these problems on their own, and in many cases are resistant to bringing their views into alignment with the Church. Why is it that outsiders are left to point out these problems within the traditionalist community? Where are their moral leaders who think with the mind of the Church? As far as I can tell, they don’t have any.
wherepeteris.com
Antisemitism and Catholic traditionalism: A match made in hell
Recently I became peripherally aware of a controversy in politically conservative media involving commentators Ben Shapiro and Candace Owens …
Well, why be surprised? In my opinion, 'Where is Peter" is the most anti-Catholic site among all sites that position themselves as Catholic. I sincerely feel sorry for the people who accept what they write on that site. In the top list of pseudo-Catholic sites that are not recommended and dangerous to the faith, it would rightfully take first place.
That's a fair point. I thought about putting that in my introduction. I hate to give the guy anymore attention than he gets, hopefully he will dry up and blow away.
@The Wandering Recluse As with so many (mostly) American blogs these days, it's all about money. Most of the founders/contributors are just ignorant or have an agenda. Look at this 'wherepeteris' blog (see below). It's a way to pay the mortgage and the bills. Souls and eternal salvation just don't even come into the equation. Donate! Donate! Donate!
@English Catholic That's an excellent point, it truly is. As an off the topic example a person can see this on YouTube. People will say or doing anything in their posts to boost their likes and subscriptions. It's all about the buck.
@The Wandering Recluse I hate to say it, but you mentioned in your original comment the attack on LifeSiteNews (LSN) - but LSN is going the same way by continually promoting sensationalist clickbait rubbish on dubious or even patently false apparitions /seers / locutions / heavenly messages etc. John Henry Westen never interviews these people with a critical stance, nor takes into consideration the …More
@The Wandering Recluse I hate to say it, but you mentioned in your original comment the attack on LifeSiteNews (LSN) - but LSN is going the same way by continually promoting sensationalist clickbait rubbish on dubious or even patently false apparitions /seers / locutions / heavenly messages etc. John Henry Westen never interviews these people with a critical stance, nor takes into consideration the official documents (often condemnations) of legitimate ecclesiastical authority. If someone says they saw Our Lady, that's good enough for ole' John-Henry. I wouldn't give a penny to LSN anymore, until it got back to promoting pro-life, pro-family and pro-marriage values, and cut the false apparition nonsense, and promotion of false apparition authors like Xavier Reyes-Ayral.
It sounds like “Where’s Peter” considers Nostra aetate as correcting a Church that had been anti-semitic for two thousand years. If the Jews don’t need to convert to Christ, then nobody else does either.
